Flaggr vs LaunchDarkly: Open-Source Feature Flags Compared

LaunchDarkly is the market leader in feature flag management. They pioneered many of the patterns teams use today and serve some of the largest engineering organizations in the world. Flaggr is an open-source alternative built for teams that want full control over their feature flag infrastructure without vendor lock-in.

This comparison is honest. LaunchDarkly does many things well, and there are scenarios where it's the better choice. We'll cover where each platform excels so you can make an informed decision.

Quick Comparison

Where LaunchDarkly Excels

SDK Ecosystem

LaunchDarkly supports 25+ SDKs including mobile (iOS, Android, React Native, Flutter), embedded systems, and less common server runtimes. If you need a Lua SDK for game servers or an Erlang SDK for telecom systems, LaunchDarkly has you covered. Flaggr focuses on the most common runtimes: TypeScript/JavaScript, Go, Java, and Python.

Enterprise Features

LaunchDarkly has years of enterprise hardening:

• Relay Proxy — a mature, battle-tested proxy for edge evaluation and reduced latency
• Workflows — approval flows and change management for regulated environments
• Custom roles — granular permission model beyond Flaggr's four-tier RBAC
• Flag triggers — automatic flag changes based on external events (PagerDuty, Datadog)

Scale and Reliability

LaunchDarkly processes trillions of flag evaluations. Their infrastructure is purpose-built for extreme scale with global edge nodes and redundant streaming. If you need guaranteed five-nines SLA with contractual backing, that's a strength of managed SaaS.

Ecosystem Integrations

Deep integrations with Jira, Slack, DataDog, PagerDuty, Terraform, and many more. LaunchDarkly has a marketplace of integrations built over years.

Where Flaggr Excels

Open Source and Self-Hosted

Flaggr is fully open source under the MIT license. You can:

• Run it on your own infrastructure with full control over data residency
• Audit every line of code for security and compliance requirements
• Customize the platform for your specific needs
• Never worry about vendor pricing changes or feature deprecation

For teams in regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) where data must stay within specific jurisdictions, self-hosting isn't optional — it's a requirement.

Multi-Protocol Support

Flaggr supports five evaluation protocols out of the box:

LaunchDarkly uses a proprietary streaming protocol. Flaggr gives you protocol choice — use REST for simplicity, gRPC for performance, or OFREP for maximum portability.

OpenFeature-Native Architecture

Flaggr was designed around OpenFeature from the ground up. The evaluation engine, providers, and context model all follow OpenFeature semantics natively. This isn't a compatibility layer bolted onto a proprietary system — it's the core architecture.

This means:

• Standard OpenFeature SDKs work out of the box
• OFREP compliance for server-to-server evaluation
• Zero lock-in: switch providers by changing one line of configuration

Cost

Flaggr is free. No per-seat pricing, no evaluation limits, no enterprise plan gates for basic features like SSO or audit logging. Self-host on a $5/month VPS or scale across a Kubernetes cluster — the software cost is zero.

LaunchDarkly's pricing starts at $10/seat/month for the Pro plan and increases significantly for Enterprise features. For a 50-person engineering team, that's $6,000+/year before considering enterprise add-ons.

Infrastructure as Code

Both platforms offer Terraform providers, but Flaggr's is designed to manage the complete flag lifecycle as code:

resource "flaggr_flag" "dark_mode" {
  service_id  = flaggr_service.web.id
  key         = "release-dark-mode"
  name        = "Dark Mode"
  type        = "boolean"
  environment = "production"
 
  targeting_rules {
    conditions {
      attribute = "plan"
      operator  = "in"
      value     = ["pro", "enterprise"]
    }
    percentage = 100
  }
}

Built-In Observability

Flaggr includes OpenTelemetry-native metrics, evaluation logging, and flag health dashboards without additional cost. LaunchDarkly's observability features require higher-tier plans and often rely on integrations with third-party monitoring tools.

Architecture Comparison

LaunchDarkly Architecture

Client SDK → LaunchDarkly CDN → Streaming Service → LaunchDarkly API

LaunchDarkly uses a CDN-first architecture. SDKs connect to a global streaming service that pushes flag updates. Evaluation happens client-side using a downloaded ruleset. This minimizes latency but means the complete flag configuration (including targeting rules) must be sent to every SDK instance.

Flaggr Architecture

Client SDK → Your Server → Flaggr Evaluation API → Storage Backend

Flaggr evaluates flags server-side by default, sending only the evaluation result to clients. This means targeting rules and segment definitions never leave your infrastructure. Client-side evaluation is available via the Web Provider for latency-sensitive use cases.

Implications

• Data privacy: Flaggr's server-side evaluation keeps targeting rules private. LaunchDarkly's client-side evaluation means rule definitions are sent to (and visible in) client SDKs.
• Latency: LaunchDarkly's client-side evaluation is faster for repeated evaluations. Flaggr's server-side evaluation requires a network call but supports caching and streaming to minimize overhead.
• Offline support: LaunchDarkly SDKs work offline with cached rules. Flaggr requires server connectivity for evaluation (the Web Provider supports a fallback cache).

When to Choose LaunchDarkly

• You need SDKs for mobile, embedded, or niche server runtimes
• Your organization requires contractual SLA guarantees
• You want a managed service with zero operational overhead
• You need deep integrations with enterprise tools (Jira workflows, PagerDuty triggers)
• Your team is large (100+ developers) and needs granular custom roles

When to Choose Flaggr

• You want open source with full code visibility and no vendor lock-in
• Data residency or compliance requires self-hosting
• You want multi-protocol support (gRPC, Connect-RPC, OFREP)
• OpenFeature-native architecture matters for your standardization strategy
• You want feature flags, experimentation, and observability without per-seat pricing
• You're already managing infrastructure with Terraform

Migration Path

If you're currently on LaunchDarkly and considering Flaggr, the migration is straightforward thanks to OpenFeature:

1. Install the Flaggr OpenFeature provider alongside your existing LaunchDarkly provider
2. Migrate flags one service at a time using Flaggr's import/export tools
3. Switch the OpenFeature provider configuration per service as you migrate
4. Remove the LaunchDarkly SDK once migration is complete

Because both platforms support OpenFeature, your application code doesn't change — only the provider configuration.

Want to try Flaggr? The quick start guide gets you running in under 5 minutes, and the migration guide covers moving from other platforms.